Monday, March 16, 2009

Multitasking


Chapter eight of John Santrock’s book Educational Psychology focuses on how students learn and the various aspects of learning such as attention and memory. It also touches on the increasing trend of divided attention in adolescents due to the availability of electronic media. While looking for an article for my critical review of a scholarly journal, I stumbled upon one that dealt with this very issue, and in fact used it for my review. The article is entitled “Mastering Multitasking” and is found in the journal Educational Leadership. The journal I found focuses on the distractions students face as a result of technology. A person can be connected to a wealth of information at the press of a button through the Internet as well as through cell phones. As a result, today’s students juggle these various distractions through multitasking. The article claims that multitasking can cause inefficient learning as studies show students require 50% additional time to complete an assignment while performing other tasks such as instant messaging. Studies have also shown that multitasking can lead to superficial learning. It advises that teachers teach students through examples how their learning is affected by multitasking and encourage students to create strategies for more efficient, focused learning.

I found this article extremely interesting as I can relate, myself being a student bombarded with technological distractions. In my own experiences, I have found that I am the most productive and efficient when doing homework in a setting removed from areas with computers, thereby decreasing my temptation to check my e-mail or look things up on the Internet. Through experience and the frustration of several hours spent distractedly trying to complete an assignment that should have taken a fraction of the time, I have devised my own method for decreasing my amount of multitasking.

Friday, March 6, 2009

Looking into the Teaching Career

I found Steve Chambliss' story and advice interesting. Previous to Monday night, I had never considered pursuing the careers in the educational field beyond teaching, such as principal or superintendent positions. I realize that it is important to continually set goals and strive to achieve to the highest potential, I don't believe that teachers should enter the education field, with their focus on becoming a principal and or superintendent. While I do not believe Mr. Chambliss was promoting this in anyway, I do believe there is a temptation for people to get caught up in the pursuit of attaining higher authority positions and better salaries. The occupation of teacher becomes a stepping stone and may lose its luster, in the process children may be deprived of the education they deserve.

I had also never thought of the value of changing subject areas or grade levels every five or so years as a teacher. I understand the importance of staying fresh and motivated as a teacher, however personally I think changing every five years could be a bit excessive. Maybe, as Dr. Langholz mentioned in class, doing things such as heading a new extracurricular activity or finding other ways to increase one's creativity and rejuvenate oneself as a teacher without making such large changes so frequently. Ultimately, I think it depends on the person and what works for them, maybe every five years is realistic and necessary for some, but maybe not for all.